logo

Home

Articles

News

About us

Contact us!

Email:
info@familynonviolence.org

Phone: 1 (508) 996-1100

Fax: 1 (508) 996-1100*51

Family Non-Violence, Inc.
P.O. Box 814
Fairhaven, MA 02719-0800

The Communicator:
A quarterly newsletter of Family Nonviolence, Inc.
Volume 6, Number 3 December 2007

In this issue:

From The Executive Director

Welcome! We continue to come to you in order to share information regarding important issues regarding domestic/family violence as well as providing information on the activities in which we as an agency are involved. We welcome you to this issue of The Communicator.

A reminder: We have begun a Yahoo discussion group entitled "Preventing Family Violence." It allows anyone to contribute to an online discussion about the issue as stated. If you have any ideas about this important issue, you can access the discussion group by going to preventingfamilyviolence@yahoogroups.com.

Also: You are welcome to respond to any item in the newsletter as well as to raise any concern about the prevention of family violence. You may reach us at our phone number (508) 996-1100. Our email address is info@familynonviolence.org.

Robert E. Heskett, Executive Director

Activities of the Agency

Restorative Justice Task Force: Eight persons from the religious communities of Quakers, Lutheran, Catholic, Unitarian, and the United Church of Christ have begun to meet bi-monthly to promote the emphasis upon Restorative Justice, a strategy for dealing with crime and interpersonal conflict that is being practiced in many countries in the world, including over 300 communities in this country. Through a Community Mini-Grant from the United Way of Greater New Bedford we provided training for one person in Peacemaking Circles, a form of Restorative Justice. We are looking at ways in which Restorative Justice could be introduced into the institutions of greater New Bedford.

Clergy Conference Task Force: Persons from the clergy, domestic violence professionals, police personnel and others from both the New Bedford and Fall River areas have been meeting together on a monthly basis to plan for promoting the awareness and prevention of domestic violence. We have completed two workshops entitled "A Time to Care" for Congregational/United Church of Christ churches on the Southcoast and for churches connected to the Wareham Area Clergy Association. The Executive Director is Chair of the task force.

Taking the Time: This is a six-month program for couples that provides feedback from a premarital inventory, monthly meetings with Mentors to guide them through reflection on the inventory, and monthly lectures on topics important to prepare for marriage.

For any of these program opportunities, call (508) 996-1100 or communicate with us at info@familynonviolence.org.

Vote of the Board of Directors: In the light of the recent emphasis upon a petition to the Legislature to prohibit spanking, the Board, although supporting a rule about no spanking, has voted to present its own petition to the Legislature. A copy of an article that has been written for the Standard-Times (which will be submitted later) is included in this newsletter: "Presenting an Alternative." The Board is seeking support for this effort. If you agree with the petition as stated in the article, please call (508) 996-1100 to voice your support.

But first, here is an article by Richard Davis, President of the Board of Directors, that gives a very contemporary emphasis.

Christmas, Holidays, Stress and Spanking

For fast-acting relief try slowing down. Lily Tomlin (1939 -, American Comic)

Christmas was not a holiday in early America. In fact, from 1659 to 1681, the celebration of Christmas was actually outlawed in Boston. During the first Christmas, under America's new constitution on December 25, 1789, Congress was in session. Christmas was not declared a national holiday until June 26, 1870. And as difficult as it may be to believe, it is us and not Christmas, that can cause this Holiday season to be complex and stressful.

Stress

Stress is a feeling that's created when we react to particular events. It's the body's way of rising to a challenge and preparing to meet a difficult situation with focus, stamina and heightened alertness. The events that provoke stress are called stressors and they cover a very wide range of events, some real and some perceived. Stressor can range from physical danger to making a speech in front people you hardly know, forgetting if you left the stove on when you left home, and yes, the December Holiday Season.

Sometimes the responsibilities and demands of life with children is enough to cause stress without any holidays. Thus once the holiday season is here stress levels can reach dangerous proportions. The extra responsibilities and expectations of the holiday season can make it difficult for some moms and dads to enjoy the season.

Another problem is the bookends of our memories. Some people remember how perfect the holiday season was for them and there is the stress of trying to recreate that perfection for our children. For others there is the memory of the holiday season being tarnished and stained by the negative behaviors of some family members, often involving the abuse of alcohol or drugs.

Historically, the Christmas season is often seen as the cause of additional family stress. During the Christmas season many adults, for reasons that are often difficult to understand, add to their already stressful life, with extensive Christmas shopping, extraordinarily long Christmas card lists, cooking vast amounts of foods, entertaining often and late into the night, and when not doing any of the above, attending parties.

Today, even for those families who do not celebrate Christmas, there are other holiday events to celebrate; such as Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, New Years, that can be enjoyed or made stressful. It is no wonder that Congress declared that December is the National Stress-Free Holiday Month. It is a long term practice of Congress to declare behaviors that seem inappropriate to many citizens, against the law, in that those behaviors or events will not occur.

There are some basic rules that individuals, without the declaration of a law by Congress, can follow to reduce stress. Most involve taking care of your health. Eat healthy, do not overdo sweets, drink alcohol at moderate levels, and sleep well. The bottom line over Christmas is, don't overdo anything that you do, do. The parenting without pressure website http://www.parentingwithoutpressure.com/holidays/nsffhm.htm offers a lengthy list of do's and don't for the holidays. Here are some of them:

  • Anticipate, because they will happen, delays, snags and disappointments.
  • Realize that holiday stress doesn't replace everyday stress. It just piles on top of your everyday stress. So what problems you're dealing with are going to be exasperated by holiday stressors.
  • Keep your sense of humor.
  • Ask for help.
  • In this 21st century shop online.
  • Get the entire family involved.
  • When the going gets tough, ask yourself, who made this so tough on me? More often than not that person is you.

The most basic rule to reduce stress over the Christmas is to put Christmas in perspective. Christmas is the day to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ. "Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men" (Luke 2:14). For those who do not celebrate the birth of Christ, the Christmas season can still be enjoyed.

The Christmas season can be a day enjoyed if not celebrated by everyone regardless of religious affiliation to inspire anyone, regardless of their religious affiliation or lack thereof, to love or respect each other. One does not have to be a Christian to make use the Christmas season to celebrate, "peace on earth and good will to everyone." Peace on earth and good will should be universal to everyone regardless of race, color, creed or nation origin.

Spanking

Over the holidays some parents will occasionally lose their patience with their children or because of stress or anger, they may hit/spank their child. While spanking may temporarily relieve a parent's frustration and temporarily end the behavior that provoked the spanking, the American Academy of Pediatrics acknowledges that spanking is the least effective way to discipline a child.

Spanking can be physically and psychology harmful to both the parent and the child. There is no question that spanking causes physical and emotional harm. It also teaches children that violence is an acceptable way to discipline, and more importantly, teaches children that physical assaults are an acceptable way to express frustration or anger.

In our homes the physical assaults against children, teach children many lessons. According to Murray Straus, Professor of Sociology and Co-Director Family Research Laboratory University of New Hampshire, children most often learn these three lessons.

(1) Those who love you the most are also those that hit you; (2) There is sometimes a moral right to hit other members of the same family; (3) When all else fails, use violence.

The nexus of spanking and domestic violence

A society that condones and legitimizes the use of physical force, violence and economic dominance as a proper means of behavior modification (spanking or coercive behavior) should not be surprised that many of its children will find rationalizations for that same type of behavior as adults, regardless of gender or sexual orientation.

Approximately 97% of three-year-olds, 49 percent of thirteen-year-olds, and 34% of fifteen to seventeen-years-olds report that they have experienced the use of physical abuse for behavioral modification at the hand of their parents.

The first lesson children often learn, both inside and outside of the home is that power and control, both physical and economic, do matter. Studies document that physical bullying and/or emotional abusive incidents are common in our schools and are equally engaged in by both boys and girls.

Parents need to understand that there are many long term means of disciplining their children that are more appropriate than physical assaults. Researchers need to explore the link between violent victimization of boys and girls by adults to similar violent offending by males and females when they become adults. And it seems illogical and irresponsible to believe that there can be some unexplained day or magical age where condoned behavior, overnight, becomes a crime.

Presenting An Alternative

There has recently been a flurry of activity in the media in response to the filing of a bill in the Legislature (House bill No. 3922) by Kathleen Wolf "to prohibit the corporal punishment of children." It has been met with a declaration of noncommittal by Representative Jay Kaufman, who filed the bill, with a poll by the Standard-Times that more than 75% who said that it was "silly," with some radio commentators stating "Kids out of line? Spanking might not be an option in Massachusetts."

It might be helpful to look at spanking in a different context. The Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety website defines "domestic violence" in this way: "Domestic violence is defined as a pattern of coercive and controlling behaviors and tactics used by one person over another to gain power and control. This may include verbal abuse, financial abuse, emotional, sexual and physical abuse." The experience where adults first learn that the use of unequal physical strength or economic coercion toward others (that is socially supported) is growing up in families. One of the first lessons that children learn is that it is acceptable for those who have more physical power and the control of economic resources to use that physical power and economic control to "get their way."

As we may remember it was once acceptable to believe that abuse that was occurring in the home, among adults in the family, was considered a "family affair." We have come to recognize that abuse of adults is no longer tolerable in our society. WE have laws that prohibit domestic violence, that is, violence between adults. We have also determined that some extreme acts of cruelty toward children is against the law, both legally and morally, that is, a parent or someone in loco parentis will be criminally responsible for assault and battery where the force employed is beyond what a reasonable parent might inflict under the same or similar circumstances.

What we have not yet come to recognize is that the exertion of power over children, including the threat and use of violence (defining spanking as violence), is not an appropriate and basically healthy way to discipline. In fact, in the case decided by the Supreme Judicial Court in Cobble v. Commissioner of the Dept. of Social Services [430 Mass. 385, 387-388, 395 (1999)] the Court ruled that a parent's spanking of a nine-year-old child with a leather belt and leaving pink marks the next day with no bruising, combined with an explanation of the reason for the punishment and expressions of caring, is not unreasonable force.

The Board of Directors of Family Nonviolence, Inc. takes the position that use of belts or other instruments on a child, under no circumstances and under Massachusetts General Law 209A, is not reasonable force. Therefore, we have voted to submit to the Legislature as alternative to House No. 3922 a petition that states "AN ACT PROHIBITING THE USE OF BELTS OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS TO DISCIPLINE CHILDREN." It includes this explanation: "The use of belts or other instruments to discipline children is not reasonable force and violates their rights to receive safe, secure and respectful care."

Richard Davis, President Family Nonviolence, Inc.

Preventing Family Violence (discussion group)

New to our discussion group?

Click here to join preventingfamilyviolence

Click to join Preventing Family Violence


Find Federal Officials
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

Find State Officials
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

Contact The Media
Enter ZIP Code:

or Search by State

References:

( These links take you to other web sites. Please use your back button to return here.)

 

Home

Articles

News

About us